Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 02:04

Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
What’s next?
Jaire Alexander’s Contract Impeded Packers’ Trade Attempts - NFL Rumors - ProFootballRumors.com
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Who was most disrespectful today, Zelensky, Trump, or Vance? Give examples.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Olfactory neurons use unexpected 'solid' clusters to achieve genetic precision - Phys.org
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Thank you.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Russia can stop this any time.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
'Good Night & Good Luck' on CNN: George Clooney's Latest Live TV Plea - IndieWire
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.